.

Legislation Would Make DEP Boss an Independently Elected Position

A local state representative cites recent department shortcomings as need for further checks and balances for public well-being.

introduced two bills—House Bills 2606 and 2607—which would amend the Pennsylvania constitution to change the Department of Environmental Protection’s appointed secretary position to a commissioner post voted for by Pennsylvania residents.

White said the legislation would end the governor’s appointment of the position and put the role of a DEP commissioner closer in line with that of the state treasurer, attorney general or auditor general, "and would create more transparency for a department that has been continually scrutinized for its clear political agenda under Gov. Tom Corbett and Sec. Michael Krancer’s lead."

“Recent events have forced me to question whether DEP has allowed political considerations to overtake pursuing policies that strike a fair and reasonable balance between protecting and developing our natural resources, and the answer is a resounding ‘yes’,” White, D-Cecil, said. “I believe an election by the people is the only means of promoting transparency within the DEP and returning the department to fully carry out its core mission, instead of playing political games that have real consequences to the health and safety of Pennsylvanians.”

House Bill 2607 states the provisions of the elective process, noted among them that the Commissioner would hold office for a term of four years and would not be eligible to serve continuously for more than two successive terms. An amendment to the State Constitution would be necessary to make the change, which would take at least five years and require state-wide approval through a referendum vote.

House Bill 2606 would change the title of the office to commissioner.

White said "it’s dangerous when complex decisions about environmental safety and health are made by a politically appointed boss presumably for political purposes. The current system only lends to political maneuvering, he said, and offers Pennsylvanians no tools to hold the DEP head accountable for poor decisions."

“I personally have been denied access to air quality test results conducted by DEP in my own district, even after I filed a Right to Know Request,” White said of “The DEP stated there was a greater interest in keeping the test results confidential instead of releasing them to the public, which is a truly astounding statement. The DEP came right out and admitted they are working for someone other than the citizens of Pennsylvania, which is reprehensible and unacceptable.”

The lawmaker added: “This implies an unacceptable lack of transparency and political motivation to protect the interests of people or entities deemed more important to Secretary Krancer and the Corbett administration than the residents of Pennsylvania. Campaign donations and political motivations should never drown out scientific facts.”

The nonprofit medical clinic in Burgettstown closed on May 25 when officials were forced to evacuate the facility for a third time because of mysterious odors seemingly linked to sickness among employees and patients. The cause of the odors has not been found, but the clinic reopened to the public.

White was denied access to the complete testing data, which indicated elevated levels of ethane, Ethylbenzene, Hexane, propane, Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), carbon disulfide and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE). The DEP refused to acknowledge a Marcellus Shale drilling site approximately half a mile from the clinic when conducting the tests, and officials then publicly stated that there was no indication the source of the problems at Cornerstone was anywhere outside.

“Either by incompetence or by design, the DEP failed to do its job at Cornerstone Care and then refused to take any accountability, hiding behind a loophole in the Open Records Act to conceal whatever they found,” said White. “Any Pennsylvanian who truly believes the DEP in its current role is committed to its stated mission of environmental protection needs to realize this is simply not reality, or else the air quality data from Cornerstone Care would have been made public.”

And he added: “This isn’t a game—it’s a big deal. If there are hazardous chemicals in the air near your home or work, you deserve to know every single piece of information there is to protect yourself and your family. When there is clear evidence of a public health hazard, politically motivated ignorance is tantamount to aiding and abetting criminally negligent behavior, which is unacceptable at every possible level.”

White stressed the goal of his legislation is not to favor any political affiliation, but to ensure Pennsylvanians have an "honest and independent watchdog" to protect the environment.

“The health and safety of Pennsylvanians should not be subject to political concerns,” White continued. “Policies should come from scientific facts; instead, we now have ‘facts’ being determined to fit specific policies, which is a violation of our Constitutional protections to clean air and water. By making the head of DEP an independently elected position, the people of Pennsylvania will have the opportunity to choose a truly independent watchdog and hold him or her accountable at the ballot box.”

Mike Knapp September 06, 2012 at 06:45 PM
The DEP is most certainly on the job when it comes to protecting Pennsylvanians. I see it every day with my own eyes working in the Marcellus shale industry. Rep White has an axe to grind with the DEP over its handling of the Cornerstone situation. Maybe even rightly so, but calling for such a constitutional amendment is just a promotional stunt for political gain at the cost of the taxpayers of Pennsylvania. If the Rep wants to see more transparency at DEP, he (and his constituents) would be much better served addressing that issue directly with legislation, rather than attempting to start an overly-dramatic, self-aggrandizing witch hunt.
cecil resident September 07, 2012 at 02:32 AM
I agree with you Mike and maybe all elected officals should be limited to two terms
Victoria Adams September 07, 2012 at 05:59 AM
Isn't this exactly what he did? He introduced legislation- it's right there for anyone to see. Debate the merits if you want, but stop hating just to hate. You look like an industry shill.
cecil resident September 07, 2012 at 12:06 PM
I'm sorry I'm not hating their is a big question mark on the whole situation. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't this a two story building and the dental office on the first floor remained open with no odors in that part of the building. If something was air born in this area wouldn't a lot more people have been sicken? Maybe their is a need for changes but I feel maybe it is for all our elected officals two terms would be good for all of them. With so many people hurting in this country maybe we should be working on getting people back to work locally and nationally.
Bill Henry September 07, 2012 at 03:28 PM
How would it cost taxpayers?
cecil resident September 07, 2012 at 05:50 PM
I have done some more thinking and a person has to have cetain qualifications for that job you just can't vote someone into that position. You know how some people vote he talks nice, he looks good don't care what he says but he smile when he says it he's got my vote. Look how well that is working with our politicians .
Victoria Adams September 07, 2012 at 07:49 PM
Well if you feel that way, then you should definitely support this move. Under the current system, the governor can appoint anyone, regardless of qualifications, as long as he gets the rubber stamp from the State Senate. By making the person run for the position, they would at least have to show some qualifications other than the ability to write a campaign contribution for $25,000 the day before getting confirmed like the current DEP Secretary Michael Krancer did.
cecil resident September 08, 2012 at 12:31 AM
That is a pretty big accusation do you have proof that $25,000 dollars exchanged hands for the job? People without qualifications get elected all the time so that is not a guarantee look at our local government, state government, and our federal government. People get elected on lies and false promises all the time.
cecil resident September 08, 2012 at 12:32 AM
Another thought maybe all our politicians need check and balances.
Liz Rosenbaum September 10, 2012 at 04:12 PM
Seems like a reasonable idea, considering how important the post is, and how the Secretary is paid with tax dollars - anything to raise the level of accountability would be a welcome change! I agree with 'proud American' that some degree of qualifications ought to be required. Wouldn't we be better served by a scientist than a Philadelphia lawyer?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something