Principal Raises Concerns About Pending Charter School Legislation

Canonsburg Middle School Principal Greg Taranto made a presentation about charter schools to the board of directors Monday—and explained pending legislation regarding them should be watched closely.

Dr. Greg Taranto stressed to the Canon-McMillan School Board earlier this week that when it comes to charter schools and pending legislation to reform them: “We have to start speaking up.”

Taranto, principal of the Canonsburg Middle School, on Monday updated the board on Senate Bill 1115—one advocates have said will reform charter schools and allow school choice.

But Taranto reiterated: “There’s not much reform going on.”

After explaining the concept of so-called “brick and mortar” charter schools and cyber charter schools, the administrator laid out a few concerns he said he had about the pending legislation.

If passed, he said the way in which charters are approved would change, among other things.

Taranto said that under current state law, an organization wishing to start a charter first makes application to the local school board. If rejected, the organization can appeal the decision to the state. But if SB 1115 is passed, he said, that decision would be controlled on a state level.

He added that while currently charters are given a set of goals and five years to meet them or have their charter revoked, if SB 1115 passes, it would change that time frame from five to 10 years.

Another concern?

Although charters are considered public schools and receive public money, the pending legislation would make the state’s Right to Know law moot when it comes to information about charters.

“If this bill passes, Right to Know will not be applicable,” Taranto said.

Taranto then gave a background about charters, explaining that they were first created in 1988.

“The idea was to improve public schools by creating best practices—not to directly compete with charter schools,” he said.

But he said that in the 1990s, those running charter schools “hijacked the premise.”

“Public schools are failing our children—that’s what they are saying,” Taranto said.

And then he went through test data and the relationship between public and charter schools.

“There is no empirical research to indicate that the shifting of millions of dollars to charters and shutting down public schools is best for student achievement,” he added.

He also showed information from a Stanford University study that was done regarding Pennsylvania charter schools—one that showed that one-third of students attending charters outperform those in public schools, one-third perform as well as those in public schools and that one-third perform at a level below that of students attending public schools.

Taranto added that charters often have high attrition rates, and that out of 12 cyber charters in the state, only one has made Adequate Yearly Progress benchmarks. 

However, he said it is hard to determine which charter has or has not made AYP as the state has applied different AYP criteria to charter schools than the state uses to evaluate public schools despite the AYP charter school calculations not being approved by the United States Department of Education

He then passed out a report from the state auditor general that estimated that public schools lose $1 million a day to charter schools—some of which are run by for-profit organizations making “millions and millions.”

“We have to keep our eyes on this,” Taranto said.

He suggested the board and community contact their local legislators to tell them they are opposed to the current Senate bill, be advocates and stay educated on the issue in hopes of “shutting down Senate Bill 1115 as it is now.”

 “As I said in the past, there is a place for charter schools, but the funding formulas need fixed and the same rules for public schools should apply to the charter schools," Taranto said.

Mana November 15, 2012 at 11:38 AM
When will CM stop worrying about funding of charter schools and start working to fix the problems in their school and try to keep the children in CM for the right reasons? I am very outspoken that I have a cyber schooled child and plan on moving all of my children, yet not once has a teacher, principal or secretary asked me why I am moving them or how they could help resolve my latest concern over CM. Remember CM does not make AYP in every school. Ask the parents is making or not making AYP matters to them . It does not matter to me. Any school can teach to the test and get expected results.
Michelle November 15, 2012 at 02:34 PM
Canon McMillan doesn't care about their students needs routinely denying 504 plans for children with an ADHD diagnosis and then badgering the parents with calls from individual teachers stating homeworks not done. It's hard for homework to get done when half of its in the locker, half is at home, half is on the Internet and when it is all in one place, the student can't remember what is supposed to be done. I don't care about your funding or you Greg Taranto!
Tresarmos November 15, 2012 at 02:49 PM
I hope that those who are home-schooling or enrolling their children in cyber schools are educating their children in grammar. Before the praises of home-schooling or cyber schools are sung in a comment or post, proof-reading may be in order. This is a prime example of why education should be left to the professionals.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »